TShirtSlayer Heavy Metal Merch Gallery
  • Bands (0)
  • Groups (0)
  • Members (0)
  • (X)

World's largest community of heavy metal tshirt and battlejacket collectors.

Type O Negative - Offense Mechanism TS

heriot07
Mon, 16/07/2018 - 20:30

Update Mon, 16/07/2018 - 20:30 - The information below is probably incorrect, this item was previously traded/sold.

OG one by blue grape merchandising 1992.
Very good conditions, some crack on the front print.
Shirt is little bit faded.
Size XL
Measurments:
Length: 69cm
Pit to pit: 59cm
Please PM for offer.

Not for sale or trade

Year: 1992
Original TShirt Fabric Color: 
Black
Size: 
XL
5
More: Type O Negative TShirts Type O Negative Patches
Type O Negative - Offense Mechanism TS
Type O Negative - Offense Mechanism TS
Type O Negative - Offense Mechanism TS
Type O Negative - Offense Mechanism TS
Type O Negative - Offense Mechanism TS
Type O Negative - Offense Mechanism TS

Nater90's picture

Always loved the back of this one. Nice shirt mate.

5
MrMunster's picture

The good old times! One of my favs.

5
578,240 items in the gallery, 883,980 comments, and 667 items have changed hands in the last month.

Guess this TShirt!

Can you guess which metal tshirt this is from?

Can you guess which metal TShirt this is from? Click here for all previous tshirt guesses

Recent Comments

  • One of the best non-black shirt designs!
  • Someone partied hard in this one
  • Very nice
  • Great looking goat shirt
  • I don't think it's from 1998.
  • Agreed! This is wonderful. Two spectacular works of misanthropic art
  • best album ;)
  • Yeah man I agree with the other two. It’s a reprint, likely from the 2000s. Still a sick sweatshirt
  • If only Immo was red border damn, I never really noticed that hahaha
  • And it’s actually woven, really nice. 😮
  • Seeing them this evening 🤘
  • Cool!
  • Thanks)
  • Nice looking print
  • Just judging by the cut, the presumably double-stitched body, and that tag, I highly doubt this is original from 80s.
  • Update: I asked the Label and they answered that it was a mistake and its Nr #107/200