I’m confused whether which one is authentic vs boot. Can anyone educate me more? I am pretty sure the licensing does NOT go on the BACK, and is a bootleg, compared to the authentic one being on the FRONT.
I’m speaking about specifically the Burzum EK LS, since it’s a rare shirt and it is prone to bootlegs. I have seen many with it on the front, and maybe 3 with it on the back,
There was not much photos, and I tried to keep the photos transparent since I do not want to affect the guys chance on a sale, being he is very respectable and nice.
But all these are from the supposed boot, plus there is no opening thing on the bottom of the shirt like the supposed authentic ones.
Shlager on
i think i DO have shirts with licensing on the back, so i don 't think that's a valid argument
Gorgoroth on
I’m speaking about specifically the Burzum EK LS, since it’s a rare shirt and it is prone to bootlegs. I have seen many with it on the front, and maybe 3 with it on the back,
doctordeath on
Not enough details, just link to the whole shirt man, there's other info like the sewing style on the neck/cuffs etc
doctordeath on
Double stitched collar... Compare it to other shirts of the time
Gorgoroth on
There was not much photos, and I tried to keep the photos transparent since I do not want to affect the guys chance on a sale, being he is very respectable and nice.
But all these are from the supposed boot, plus there is no opening thing on the bottom of the shirt like the supposed authentic ones.
Beer.Browser on
For what it’s worth I have a 1997 venom with the Fiend tag. The tag is properly sewn into the neck and not onto it like the one you posted.
If it seems fishy to you it’s best to steer clear tbh