TShirtSlayer Heavy Metal Merch Gallery
  • Bands (0)
  • Groups (0)
  • Members (0)
  • (X)

World's largest community of heavy metal tshirt and battlejacket collectors.

Iron Maiden My Battlejacket

Thrasher Ralle
Tue, 23/10/2012 - 21:34
Not for sale or trade

Year: 2012
5
Bands: 
1c062d37c0adbc53c271aa4275f5f490.jpg
4c90f6bb95e772c8f76bc8c3438b9cee.jpg

Demolition_hell_hammer's picture

Nice Jacket!

Plague's picture

This is put together really well. I'm noticing a lot of chains on jackets lately.

5
VoiceOfTheSoul's picture

I noticed that a lot more when I first joined about a year ago than now. Seemed like for every two jackets there was one with chains. Though it's quite possible I just haven't been paying as much attention

Rover133's picture

Pretty bad ass.

5
MetalWarrior's picture

Schaut gut aus.. RalfThrasher

5
Extremeaggression's picture

angel of damnation, geile sache! sehr geile kutte!

lole66's picture

Great kutte, i love your Kiss stripe patch

5
Thrasher Ralle's picture

Thx all

cornedbeef's picture

nice oldskool S.O.D patch :)

5
578,240 items in the gallery, 883,980 comments, and 667 items have changed hands in the last month.

Guess this TShirt!

Can you guess which metal tshirt this is from?

Can you guess which metal TShirt this is from? Click here for all previous tshirt guesses

Recent Comments

  • One of the best non-black shirt designs!
  • Someone partied hard in this one
  • Very nice
  • Great looking goat shirt
  • I don't think it's from 1998.
  • Agreed! This is wonderful. Two spectacular works of misanthropic art
  • best album ;)
  • Yeah man I agree with the other two. It’s a reprint, likely from the 2000s. Still a sick sweatshirt
  • If only Immo was red border damn, I never really noticed that hahaha
  • And it’s actually woven, really nice. 😮
  • Seeing them this evening 🤘
  • Cool!
  • Thanks)
  • Nice looking print
  • Just judging by the cut, the presumably double-stitched body, and that tag, I highly doubt this is original from 80s.
  • Update: I asked the Label and they answered that it was a mistake and its Nr #107/200