but I don't see any reason somebody would've attached that tag. the authenticity of the shirt is proven with Brockum writing beneath... the tag could simply be taken away and it still wouldn't have changed anything...
agree.. but first and the foremost - you can distinguish real from fake. my point being - printing that copyright text and quality picture would suffice, right? why make unnecessary efforts to attach the tag?
I got your point buddy. I'm not saying it's not possible.. but if you can make copies so close to the authentic then you're gonna print the very tags they have. why print the ones you're not sure the real things have...
maanelyst on
Anvil tag at 1991? hmmmm....
did not know that they was there.
Whos have info?
jaba71 on
think it's not official?
maanelyst on
not sure. couse there is made in US
but all that I see before was at modern prints
jaba71 on
but I don't see any reason somebody would've attached that tag. the authenticity of the shirt is proven with Brockum writing beneath... the tag could simply be taken away and it still wouldn't have changed anything...
jaba71 on
agree.. but first and the foremost - you can distinguish real from fake. my point being - printing that copyright text and quality picture would suffice, right? why make unnecessary efforts to attach the tag?
jaba71 on
I got your point buddy. I'm not saying it's not possible.. but if you can make copies so close to the authentic then you're gonna print the very tags they have. why print the ones you're not sure the real things have...
Carovoivod on
Anvil 1991? Probably a reprint, still awesome!!!,
maanelyst on
As I said I'm not sure.
Anvil is old US brand but vintage tags that I find was printed with red.
If anybody have more info add please
maanelyst on
little more here
http://www.defunkd.com/forum/random-f7/daniel-johnston-how-are-you-tee-w...
http://www.defunkd.com/blog/2010/07/29/anvil/