Using without permission
I have seen in the past people getting a little upset about other people using their pictures without permission so I stumbled upon a Tumblr that I've seen some peoples jackets on. They looked like a lot of work and thought that they should at least know that they have been used without their permission.
The link is:http://fashionpunks.tumblr.com/page/2
The jackets look awesome by the way! I just think credit should have been given.
Im most likely just being an asshole.
Which TShirt?
Random Item
Updated Website!
Bands by name
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- K
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- Q
- R
- S
- T
- U
- V
- W
- X
- Y
- Z
- 0-9
- #
Recent Comments
-
Literally just got my Filth hounds backpatch! TANK fucking rule
-
Australian fellow who listens to Barren Earth, Stam1na and Mokoma? Nice!
-
Awesome Kutte!!
-
Kutte / Battlejacket updatet!!!
-
Perfect kutte , just miss on it your amazing Diamond head circular logo !
-
Pretty weird mixture of bands..
-
Exactly my thoughts: What the fuck is Aria doing there?!
-
Killer kutte, love the back with studs
-
Is this shirt still available for sale or trade?
-
Unholy Shit O.o
-
Dankje heb ze een paar jaar geleden een keer gezien ;-)
-
Dankje heb ze een paar jaar geleden een keer gezien ;-)
-
Hahaha ik zie het :) heb er ook heel veel zin in :-D
-
Aria with slipknot and trivium?? mm no
-
Too bad it's the only album I own from them..but hell, it's a great one!
Forum Activity
Top Collectors
Poll
New threads...
Recent Trades / Sells
NoneFuckingHeavier made
Pier the new owner of BOLT THROWER "Those O.L. Tour 2006" LS Large- Sale Or Trade
Deathcrush made CHAOS AND METAL the new owner of Acid Reign - Humanoia (Official Woven Patch)
Deathcrush made CHAOS AND METAL the new owner of Helloween - Keeper of the Seven Keys I (Woven Patch)
Pier made
NoneFuckingHeavier the new owner of Bolt Thrower - tourshirt 2006
venice thrasher made
SABBATRINITY the new owner of Sadus patch
View all Trade / Sells
R.J. on
The pictures still contain the Tshirtslayer watermark and are being used for non-commercial purposes. Although they should have included a link to Tshirtslayer in the blog post, once you upload your image to this site it becomes the property of Tshirtslayer and is licensed under Creative Commons. As long as they're not making money off of the images, they're allowed to use them without the original uploader's permission.
InvertChrist on
Oh, that makes sense.
I apologize then. I've just read in the past that people still get mad over the fact people use them without their permission even with the water mark.
R.J. on
Well they technically shouldn't be using the images without linking to TSS, so the owners of those jackets have a right to be mad about that. Good find.
Also, if you read this DoctorDeath, the watermark really needs to be more legible!
InvertChrist on
I do stroll a lot of shit on Tumblr and found something I like and thought I would share it since I would be pissed off. It looks like a lot of effort was put into making them.
10Join on
It would be wise if they actually posted the source back to TSS, I can understand that it isn't being used for money, but it's better have a source.
whiteravenmetal on
haha, you can't make money with tumblr, and less with a blog like this, I have seen a lot of pics of jackets of tss, but all have the watermark, and some people post the source in their posts, so I guess is ok. People reblog this images because they think some of the jackets are awesome, and want to have it in their blogs, but yeah I agree that they should post the source.
Thrash is my busines on
I have seen a lot of jackets and vests of tss on tumblr
DoctorDeath on
yeah its ok, aslong as they keep the watermark, and dont try to make money from it, then i wont sue :)
blackstar1965 on
I like how Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen are pictured there. Their jackets appear to be more "bedazzled" than studded.
blackstar1965 on
They're hot.
fashion punks... excuse me while I retch
jeremybassmetal on
Biiiiiiiiig fucking +1
Oby Machado on
thats why watermarks have to be added
Blüdrayne on
actually, under this particular licence, permission is not needed if the copyrighted property is used under the given guidelines.
so in this case, keeping the watermark can be taken as acknowledgment of the original source and thus this image is used in a legally "correct" manner.